Mathews v. Parker

52 S.E. 322, 124 Ga. 144, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 676
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 10, 1905·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Fish, O. J.

1. A petition for certiorari must allege error so specifically and distinctly that a reviewing court may understand the ground of error relied on. Clements v. McCormick Machine Co., 115 Ga. 851. Such a petition, which sets forth all the evidence submitted on the trial before a jury in a justice’s court, and alleges that the verdict complained of is against the weight of the evidence and without evidence to support it, sufficiently complies with this rule.

2. The Supreme Court will not disturb the first grant of a new trial upon certiorari, when the verdict was not demanded by the evidence. Brantley v. Taylor, 121 Ga. 475.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. W. M. Lewis, for plaintiffs in error. W. L. Wilson and A. B. Hutcheson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mathews v. Parker, 52 S.E. 322, 124 Ga. 144, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 676 (Ga. 1905).

52 S.E. 322 (Mathews v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wood v. Fairfax Loan & Investment Co.
177 S.E. 260 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Pace v. Pace
115 S.E. 65 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Gresham v. Lee
112 S.E. 524 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Birdford Supply Co. v. Edwards
85 S.E. 687 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Harwell v. Marshall
54 S.E. 93 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)