Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

214 N.C. 817
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 21, 1938·Published

Opinion

Per Oueiam.

Tbe Court being evenly divided in opinion, Barnhill, J., not sitting, tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court is affirmed and stands, according to tbe uniform practice in appellate courts, as tbe decision of tbis case, without becoming a precedent. Mfg. Co. v. Mfg. Co., 201 N. C., 823, 159 S. E., 411; Seay v. Ins. Co., 208 N. C., 832, 179 S. E., 888; Braswell v. Wilson, 212 N. C., 833, 193 S. E., 20; Seay v. Ins. Co., 213 N. C., 660, 197 S. E., 151; Patterson v. Hosiery Mills, ante, 24, 197 S. E., 597; Ins. Co. v. Stinson, ante, 97, 197 S. E., 751.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 214 N.C. 817 (N.C. 1938).

214 N.C. 817 (Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seay v. American Savings Life Insurance
197 S.E. 151 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Patterson v. Durham Hosiery Mills
197 S.E. 597 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Braswell v. . Wilson
193 S.E. 20 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Mfg. Co. v. . Mfg. Co.
159 S.E. 411 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Seay v. . Insurance Co.
179 S.E. 888 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)