Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
This text of 214 N.C. 817 (Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe Court being evenly divided in opinion, Barnhill, J., not sitting, tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court is affirmed and stands, according to tbe uniform practice in appellate courts, as tbe decision of tbis case, without becoming a precedent. Mfg. Co. v. Mfg. Co., 201 N. C., 823, 159 S. E., 411; Seay v. Ins. Co., 208 N. C., 832, 179 S. E., 888; Braswell v. Wilson, 212 N. C., 833, 193 S. E., 20; Seay v. Ins. Co., 213 N. C., 660, 197 S. E., 151; Patterson v. Hosiery Mills, ante, 24, 197 S. E., 597; Ins. Co. v. Stinson, ante, 97, 197 S. E., 751.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 N.C. 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brantley-v-atlantic-coast-line-railroad-nc-1938.