Patterson v. Durham Hosiery Mills

197 S.E. 597, 214 N.C. 24, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 252
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 15, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 197 S.E. 597 (Patterson v. Durham Hosiery Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patterson v. Durham Hosiery Mills, 197 S.E. 597, 214 N.C. 24, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 252 (N.C. 1938).

Opinion

Per Cubiam.

This is an action to restrain, the defendants from further declaring and/or paying dividends on any stock of the defendant corporation until the accrued dividends on the 6% preferred stock of the plaintiffs, and on the stock of other nonassenting shareholders, are paid and/or discharged. His Honor, Judge Spears, entered judgment continuing the temporary restraining order theretofore issued by his Honor, Judge Williams, until the final determination of the action, from which judgment the defendants appealed, assigning error.

Devin, J., not sitting, and the remaining six members of the Court being equally divided in opinion as to whether there are on the record any disputed facts which' should be determined before final judgment, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. Braswell v. Town of Wilson, 212 N. C., 833, and cases there cited. This leaves undecided the questions of law sought to be presented, as they do not presently arise.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brantley v. . R. R.
198 S.E. 599 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
214 N.C. 817 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 S.E. 597, 214 N.C. 24, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-durham-hosiery-mills-nc-1938.