Seay v. . Insurance Co.

179 S.E. 888, 208 N.C. 832, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 153
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 22, 1935·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Civil action to recover agent's commissions on insurance premium renewals, "paid to and accepted by the (defendant) company, while this (agency) contract is in force . . . limit 9 years."

The defendant sought to terminate its agency contract with the plaintiff, prior to the expiration of the ninth renewal of some of the policies written by plaintiff. This suit is to recover commissions on such renewals up to the 9th on each policy.

Judgment of nonsuit was entered in the municipal court of the city of High Point, which was reversed on appeal to the Superior Court of Guilford County. *Page 833

From the ruling of the Superior Court the defendant appeals, assigning errors. The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Clarkson, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands, according to the uniform practice of appellate courts, as the decision in this case, without becoming a precedent. Com. Co. v. Mfg. Co., 201 N.C. 823, 159 S.E. 411;Raynor v. Ins. Co., 193 N.C. 385, 137 S.E. 137; Jenkins v. Lbr. Co.,187 N.C. 864, 123 S.E. 82; Miller v. Bank, 176 N.C. 152,96 S.E. 977; Durham v. R. R., 113 N.C. 240, 18 S.E. 208.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seay v. . Insurance Co., 179 S.E. 888, 208 N.C. 832, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 153 (N.C. 1935).

179 S.E. 888 (Seay v. . Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brantley v. . R. R.
198 S.E. 599 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
214 N.C. 817 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Powell v. . Veasey
197 S.E. 622 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Seay v. American Savings Life Insurance
197 S.E. 151 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)