Braithwaite v. Hinkle

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Braithwaite v. Hinkle. Read the opinion of the Court — 382 F. App'x 297
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 24, 2011·No. 10-7390·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7390

OCARY BRAITHWAITE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden (GRCC); THOMPSON, Dr., Medical Physician; D. SPEARS, Nurse; BENJAMIN ELLIS, Medical Physician; MR. GERARD F. BOYLE, CEO, Prison Health Srv.,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00879-TSE-JFA)

Submitted: January 25, 2011 Decided: February 24, 2011

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ocary Braithwaite, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant George M. Hinkle.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ocary Braithwaite appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to George Hinkle and dismissing his

complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Braithwaite v.

Hinkle, No. 1:09-cv-00879-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 20, 2010

& entered Sept. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Braithwaite v. Hinkle, (4th Cir. 2011).

Braithwaite v. Hinkle (Braithwaite v. Hinkle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.