Braithwaite v. Hinkle

Fourth Circuit

Braithwaite v. Hinkle

412 F. App'x 583

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Braithwaite v. Hinkle. Read the opinion of the Court — 382 F. App'x 297 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 24, 2011·No. No. 10-7390·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ocary Braithwaite appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to George Hinkle and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Braithwaite v. Hinkle, 752 F.Supp.2d 692 (E.D.Va.2010 & entered Sept. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ocary Braithwaite appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to George Hinkle and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Braithwaite v. Hinkle, 752 F.Supp.2d 692 (E.D.Va.2010 & entered Sept. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Braithwaite v. Hinkle, 412 F. App'x 583 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

412 F. App'x 583 (Braithwaite v. Hinkle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related