Braithwaite v. Hinkle
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6201
OCARY BRAITHWAITE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden (GRCC); GERALD F. BOYLE, CEO, Prison Health Services; DR. THOMPSON, Medical Physician; D. SPEARS, Nurse; BENJAMIN ELLIS,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00879-TSE)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 10, 2010
Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. *
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ocary Braithwaite, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
* This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). PER CURIAM:
Ocary Braithwaite appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Braithwaite v. Hinkle, No. 1:09-cv-00879-TSE (E.D. Va.
Jan. 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Braithwaite v. Hinkle (Braithwaite v. Hinkle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.