Braithwaite v. Hinkle

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Braithwaite v. Hinkle. Read the opinion of the Court — 382 F. App'x 297
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 10, 2010·No. 10-6201·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6201

OCARY BRAITHWAITE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden (GRCC); GERALD F. BOYLE, CEO, Prison Health Services; DR. THOMPSON, Medical Physician; D. SPEARS, Nurse; BENJAMIN ELLIS,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00879-TSE)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 10, 2010

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. *

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ocary Braithwaite, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

* This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). PER CURIAM:

Ocary Braithwaite appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Braithwaite v. Hinkle, No. 1:09-cv-00879-TSE (E.D. Va.

Jan. 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Braithwaite v. Hinkle, (4th Cir. 2010).

Braithwaite v. Hinkle (Braithwaite v. Hinkle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related