Bowman Biscuit Co. of Texas v. Hines

251 S.W.2d 153, 151 Tex. 370, 1952 Tex. LEXIS 447
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 16, 1952
DocketA-3298
StatusPublished
Cited by34 cases

This text of 251 S.W.2d 153 (Bowman Biscuit Co. of Texas v. Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowman Biscuit Co. of Texas v. Hines, 251 S.W.2d 153, 151 Tex. 370, 1952 Tex. LEXIS 447 (Tex. 1952).

Opinions

Mr. Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the Court, on rehearing.

On July 3, 1951, the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District of Texas, through the Honorable Joel R. Bond, Chief Justice, certified to this court for adjudication and answer the following question:

“Where the ultimate consumer of food, sold in the original sealed package for human consumption, suffers injury and damage from such food being contaminated, is the wholesaler, or middleman, as well as the manufacturer and retailer, liable to such ultimate consumer for damages proximately resulting to him by reason of the eating of such food, under an implied warwanty imposed by law as a matter of public policy?”

On original hearing the above certified question was [372]*372answered in the affirmative in an opinion by Associate Justice Garwood joined by Associate Justices Sharp, Brewster, Griffin and Wilson. Chief Justice Hickman and Associate Justices Smedley and Calvert joined Associate Justice Smith in a dissenting opinion holding that the question should be answered in the negative.

On rehearing, Associate Justice Wilson has this day delivered an opinion concurring with the view that the question should be answered in the negative; therefore, the motion for rehearing is granted and the certified question is answered “No.”

Opinion delivered July 16, 1952.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CHCA Bayshore, L.P. v. Ramos
388 S.W.3d 741 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012)
In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P.
290 S.W.3d 204 (Texas Supreme Court, 2009)
Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Crocker
502 S.W.2d 850 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Gravis v. Abbott Laboratories
462 S.W.2d 410 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Freitas v. Twin City Fisherman's Cooperative Ass'n
452 S.W.2d 931 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Pittsburg Coca-Cola Bottling Works of Pittsburg v. Ponder
443 S.W.2d 546 (Texas Supreme Court, 1969)
McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.
416 S.W.2d 787 (Texas Supreme Court, 1967)
Shamrock Fuel & Oil Sales Co. v. Tunks
416 S.W.2d 779 (Texas Supreme Court, 1967)
Jack Roach-Bissonnet, Inc. v. Puskar
417 S.W.2d 262 (Texas Supreme Court, 1967)
Capetillo v. Crosby County Fuel Association
407 S.W.2d 335 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Shamrock Fuel & Oil Sales Co. v. Tunks
406 S.W.2d 483 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Price v. Gatlin and Columbia Tractor & Implement Co.
405 P.2d 502 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1965)
Robert D. Putman v. Erie City Manufacturing Company
338 F.2d 911 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)
Ford Motor Company v. Marvin R. Mathis
322 F.2d 267 (Fifth Circuit, 1963)
Kansas City Title Insurance Co. v. Atlas Life Insurance Co.
336 S.W.2d 204 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1960)
State v. Federal Land Bank of Houston
329 S.W.2d 847 (Texas Supreme Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 S.W.2d 153, 151 Tex. 370, 1952 Tex. LEXIS 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowman-biscuit-co-of-texas-v-hines-tex-1952.