Bouldin v. Mote

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bouldin v. Mote

220 S.E.2d 79, 136 Ga. App. 73, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1251

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 7, 1975

Docket51268

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 220 S.E.2d 79 (Bouldin v. Mote) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bouldin v. Mote, 220 S.E.2d 79, 136 Ga. App. 73, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1251 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

In the instant case appeal was taken from the order of the trial judge vacating and setting aside default judgments and from the order of the trial judge refusing to grant appellant’s motion to set aside these prior orders vacating the default judgments. The orders left the case still pending in the court below; the judgments were not final and not of the type specifically exempted under the provisions of Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) (3). A judgment overruling a general demurrer to a motion to allow the opening of a default judgment and the filing of defensive pleadings is not final. Nye v. Murcel Mfg. Co., 116 Ga. App. 44 (156 SE2d 383); Harry v. Scenic Heights Development Corp., 218 Ga. 352 (127 SE2d 898). The judgment not being final and no certificate of immediate review being presented, this appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Evans and Stolz, JJ., concur. *74 Submitted September 29, 1975 Decided October 7, 1975. Jay William Bouldin, pro se. T. V. Mullinax, Lokey & Bowden, Glenn Frick, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deen, Presiding Judge.

In the instant case appeal was taken from the order of the trial judge vacating and setting aside default judgments and from the order of the trial judge refusing to grant appellant’s motion to set aside these prior orders vacating the default judgments. The orders left the case still pending in the court below; the judgments were not final and not of the type specifically exempted under the provisions of Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) (3). A judgment overruling a general demurrer to a motion to allow the opening of a default judgment and the filing of defensive pleadings is not final. Nye v. Murcel Mfg. Co., 116 Ga. App. 44 (156 SE2d 383); Harry v. Scenic Heights Development Corp., 218 Ga. 352 (127 SE2d 898). The judgment not being final and no certificate of immediate review being presented, this appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Evans and Stolz, JJ., concur. *74 Submitted September 29, 1975 Decided October 7, 1975. Jay William Bouldin, pro se. T. V. Mullinax, Lokey & Bowden, Glenn Frick, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 S.E.2d 79, 136 Ga. App. 73, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bouldin-v-mote-gactapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack