Associated Architects, Inc. v. Holland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Associated Architects, Inc. v. Holland

229 S.E.2d 674, 139 Ga. App. 793, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1994

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 5, 1976·No. 52555·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

Judgment was entered against the defendant-appellee and upon motion of defendant, it was vacated and set aside on April 23, 1976, leaving the case pending in the court below. Notice of appeal from this action was filed on the 5th day of May, 1976. No certificate of review appears in the record, nor does it appear an application for interlocutory appeal was filed and granted according to Section 1 of the Act of 1975 (Ga. L. 1975, pp. 757, 758); Code Ann. § 6-701(a) 2 (A). See also Bouldin v. Mote, 136 Ga. App. 73 (220 SE2d 79). The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed as premature.

Appeal dismissed.

Marshall and McMurray, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, Judge.

Judgment was entered against the defendant-appellee and upon motion of defendant, it was vacated and set aside on April 23, 1976, leaving the case pending in the court below. Notice of appeal from this action was filed on the 5th day of May, 1976. No certificate of review appears in the record, nor does it appear an application for interlocutory appeal was filed and granted according to Section 1 of the Act of 1975 (Ga. L. 1975, pp. 757, 758); Code Ann. § 6-701(a) 2 (A). See also Bouldin v. Mote, 136 Ga. App. 73 (220 SE2d 79). The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed as premature.

Appeal dismissed.

Marshall and McMurray, JJ., concur.

Associated Architects, Inc. v. Holland, 229 S.E.2d 674, 139 Ga. App. 793, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1994 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

229 S.E.2d 674 (Associated Architects, Inc. v. Holland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related