Boston & Providence Railroad Corp. Stockholders v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

350 U.S. 926, 100 L. Ed. 810, 76 S. Ct. 300, 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1537
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 9, 1956·No. No. 437·Published·Cited by 55 cases

Opinion

[926] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Per Curiam:

The motion of Boston & Providence Railroad Corporation Stockholders Committee for leave to intervene or, in the alternative, to file brief as amicus curiae is denied. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boston & Providence Railroad Corp. Stockholders v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 350 U.S. 926, 100 L. Ed. 810, 76 S. Ct. 300, 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1537 (1956).

350 U.S. 926 (Boston & Providence Railroad Corp. Stockholders v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Del-Val Financial Corp. Securities Litigation
158 F.R.D. 270 (S.D. New York, 1994)
MMR/Wallace Power & Industrial, Inc. v. Thames Associates
764 F. Supp. 712 (D. Connecticut, 1991)
Huntington v. Great Western Resources, Inc.
655 F. Supp. 565 (S.D. New York, 1987)
United States Football League v. National Football League
605 F. Supp. 1448 (S.D. New York, 1985)
State v. Martinez
673 P.2d 509 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1983)
Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.
689 F.2d 715 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
Reardon v. Marlayne, Inc.
416 A.2d 852 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1980)
Chadwick v. Superior Court
106 Cal. App. 3d 108 (California Court of Appeal, 1980)
Price v. Admiral Insurance
481 F. Supp. 374 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1979)
Rossworm v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.
468 F. Supp. 168 (N.D. New York, 1979)
Intern. Union, Uaw v. Nat. Caucus, Lab. Com.
466 F. Supp. 564 (S.D. New York, 1979)
Armstrong v. McAlpin
461 F. Supp. 622 (S.D. New York, 1978)