Boston Hydraulic Gold Min. Co. v. Eagle Copper & Silver Min. Co

115 U.S. 221
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 2, 1885·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

6 S.Ct. 33

115 U.S. 221

29 L.Ed. 392

BOSTON HYDRAULIC GOLD MIN. CO.
v.
EAGLE COPPER & SILVER MIN. CO.

Filed October 26, 1885.

No appearance for plaintiff in error.

G. A. Nourse, for defendant in error.

WAITE, C. J.

When this cause was reached on the call of the docket it was submitted by the defendant in error on a printed brief. An assignment of errors was not annexed to or returned with the writ of error, as required by section 997, Rev. St. At the last term the counsel for the plaintiff in error was permitted to withdraw his appearance, and no one has taken his place. No argument has been submitted in behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no errors have been assigned in any form. We therefore affirm the judgment without opening the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boston Hydraulic Gold Min. Co. v. Eagle Copper & Silver Min. Co, 115 U.S. 221 (1885).

115 U.S. 221 (Boston Hydraulic Gold Min. Co. v. Eagle Copper & Silver Min. Co) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co.
115 U.S. 221 (Supreme Court, 1885)