Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co.

Supreme Court

Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co.

115 U.S. 221, 6 S. Ct. 33, 29 L. Ed. 392, 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1831

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 26, 1885·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mw. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court. When this cause was reached on the call of the docket it was submitted by the defendant, in error on a printed brief. An assignment of errors was not annexed to or returned with the writ of error, as required by § 997 Kev. Stat. At the last term the counsel for the plaintiff in error was permitted to withdraw his appearance, and no one has taken his place. No argument has been submitted in behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no errors have been assigned in any form. We, therefore, affirm the judgment without opening the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mw. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court. When this cause was reached on the call of the docket it was submitted by the defendant, in error on a printed brief. An assignment of errors was not annexed to or returned with the writ of error, as required by § 997 Kev. Stat. At the last term the counsel for the plaintiff in error was permitted to withdraw his appearance, and no one has taken his place. No argument has been submitted in behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no errors have been assigned in any form. We, therefore, affirm the judgment without opening the record.

Affirmed.

Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co., 115 U.S. 221, 6 S. Ct. 33, 29 L. Ed. 392, 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1831 (1885).

Pincite

115 U.S. 221 (Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related