Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co.
This text of 115 U.S. 221 (Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court. When this cause was reached on the call of the docket it was submitted by the defendant, in error on a printed brief. An assignment of errors was not annexed to or returned with the writ of error, as required by § 997 Kev. Stat. At the last term the counsel for the plaintiff in error was permitted to withdraw his appearance, and no one has taken his place. No argument has been submitted in behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no errors have been assigned in any form. We, therefore, affirm the judgment without opening the record.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 U.S. 221, 6 S. Ct. 33, 29 L. Ed. 392, 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boston-mining-co-v-eagle-mining-co-scotus-1885.