Jacks v. Helena
This text of 115 U.S. 288 (Jacks v. Helena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court. These motions are granted-on the authority of Detroit City Railway Co. v. Guthard, 114 U. S. 133, and the cases there cited. It appears distinctly on the face of the opinion of the court below, which, by the laws of Arkansas, forms part of the record, Rev. Stat. Ark. 1884, § 1318 [Gannt’s Dig. (1874) §§ 1108,1109], that the decision of the case -was put, and properly put, on a ground which did not involve a consideration of the Federal question that may possibly have, been presented by one of the several defences set up in the answer of the city, to wit: that the Constitution of 1S74 prohibited the issue of the-bonds in dispute. In fact, it is intimated in the opinion, that, if the case had rested on this defence alone, the judgment would have been the other way.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 U.S. 288, 6 S. Ct. 39, 29 L. Ed. 392, 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacks-v-helena-scotus-1885.