Borough of Alpine v. Alpine Hills, Inc.
430 A.2d 641, 179 N.J. Super. 65, 2 N.J. Tax 391, 1981 N.J. Super. LEXIS 738
Opinion
The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Hopkins in his written opinion of June 25, 1980, reported at 1 N.J.Tax 136 (Tax Ct. 1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Borough of Alpine v. Alpine Hills, Inc., 430 A.2d 641, 179 N.J. Super. 65, 2 N.J. Tax 391, 1981 N.J. Super. LEXIS 738 (N.J. Ct. App. 1981).
430 A.2d 641 (Borough of Alpine v. Alpine Hills, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
90 Riverdale, L.L.C. v. Borough of Riverdale
27 N.J. Tax 328 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2013)
Gale & Kitson Fredon Golf, L.L.C. v. Township of Fredon
26 N.J. Tax 268 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2011)
City of Jersey City v. Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills
16 N.J. Tax 504 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1997)
Ford Motor Co. v. Edison Township
10 N.J. Tax 153 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1988)
Newark City v. Cedar Grove Township
7 N.J. Tax 66 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1984)
Antanovich v. Allstate Insurance
467 A.2d 345 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Parillo v. GEICO
26 Pa. D. & C.3d 737 (Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, 1983)
Riccio v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co.
179 N.J. Super. 65 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1981)