Home/U.S. Customs Court/Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 396
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Border Brokerage Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 Cust. Ct. 236 →
United States Customs Court·Decided December 22, 1960·No. No. 65979; protest 59/8926 (Seattle)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 396 (cusc 1960).

45 Cust. Ct. 396 (Border Brokerage Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tower v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 36 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)