Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 347
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Border Brokerage Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Cust. Ct. 179 →
United States Customs Court·Decided April 6, 1959·No. No. 62956; protest 58/10082 (Seattle)·Published
Opinion
[348]*348Opinion by
When this case was called for trial, it was stipulated that the only items repaired in Canada were the engines and that no portion of the power saws had been repaired. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following George S. Bush & Co., Inc. v. United States, 41 C.C.P.A. 33, C.A.O. 525), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Border Brokerage Co. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 347 (cusc 1959).
42 Cust. Ct. 347 (Border Brokerage Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States
41 C.C.P.A. 33 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1953)