Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 562

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Border Brokerage Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Cust. Ct. 326 →

United States Customs Court·Decided January 4, 1957·No. Reap. Dec. 8721; Entry No. 05-02492·Published

Opinion

Donlon, Judge:

On trial of this case in Seattle, defendant made the following motion:

Ma. Weil. The Government moves to dismiss upon the ground that the merchandise has never been appraised by the Appraiser; the notice was given and the importer filed an appeal to reappraisement but in view of the fact that the merchandise had not been appraised, the Government moves to dismiss.

Mb. Tuttle. I have no objection. (R. 2.)

Upon motion of defendant, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donlon, Judge:

On trial of this case in Seattle, defendant made the following motion:

Ma. Weil. The Government moves to dismiss upon the ground that the merchandise has never been appraised by the Appraiser; the notice was given and the importer filed an appeal to reappraisement but in view of the fact that the merchandise had not been appraised, the Government moves to dismiss.

Mb. Tuttle. I have no objection. (R. 2.)

Upon motion of defendant, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 562 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

38 Cust. Ct. 562 (Border Brokerage Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.