Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 389, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1797
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Border Brokerage Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 Cust. Ct. 496
United States Customs Court·Decided January 28, 1954·No. No. 57816; protests 135902-K, etc. (Seattle)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of the merchandise marked “A,” parts of internal-combustion engines, imported separately, or marked “B,” internal-combustion engines, imported with power saws, are the same in all material respects as the articles involved in Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. v. United States (41 C. C. P. A. 33, C. A. D. 525), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Further, in accordance with said stipulation, it was held that the value of said items marked “A” is tíie appraised value and that the value of said, items marked “B” is the percentage of the appraised value of said power saws, as noted in green ink on the invoices by the examiner.___

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 389, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1797 (cusc 1954).

32 Cust. Ct. 389 (Border Brokerage Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.