Booker v. Booker

648 S.E.2d 445, 286 Ga. App. 6, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 1999, 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 681
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 20, 2007
DocketA07A0110
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 648 S.E.2d 445 (Booker v. Booker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Booker v. Booker, 648 S.E.2d 445, 286 Ga. App. 6, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 1999, 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 681 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinions

Miller, Judge.

After Marcus D. Booker died intestate, his surviving spouse, Kewanda Reid Booker (“Ms. Booker” or “wife”), petitioned the probate court for a year’s support. The probate court granted such petition without objection upon notice, publication, and service as required by law. The decedent’s mother, Johnnie Mae Booker (the “mother”), appealed to the superior court, but the superior court dismissed her appeal, finding that she “has no standing to object to the award of [a] Year’s Support since she has no property right, claim or interest in or against the Estate of Marcus D. Booker.” The mother appeals, but finding that she lacked standing to appeal from the judgment of the probate court because she was a nonparty in such proceedings and otherwise without any legally cognizable interest therein, we affirm.

The evidence shows that prior to his death, Mr. Booker had filed a complaint for divorce from his wife. The complaint for divorce was dismissed with prejudice upon his death. The decedent and Ms. Booker, however, had executed a settlement agreement in contemplation of its incorporation in any final decree of divorce. Under the agreement, Ms. Booker, among other things, “release[d] all right, title, and interest she may have in [the decedent’s] estate.”

The mother contends that the probate court’s award of a year’s support to Ms. Booker was foreclosed in light of the settlement agreement by which Ms. Booker had released any interest in the decedent’s estate. We find, as the trial court did, that the mother lacks standing to make such a claim.

Pretermitting the enforceability of the settlement agreement, an appeal from a decision in the probate court under OCGA § 5-3-2 must be taken by the party plaintiff or party defendant. OCGA § 5-3-5; see also Samples v. Greene, 138 Ga. App. 823, 827 (6) (227 SE2d 456) (1976) (“Only parties to the proceeding below may be parties on appeal. [OCGA § 5-6-37.]”). Given that the mother was not a party in the probate court despite publication of notice and service (see Montgomery v. McCants, 49 Ga. App. 324, 327 (175 SE 397) (1934)), [7]*7she lacked standing to appeal its decision. OCGA § 5-3-5; Knowles v. Knowles, 125 Ga. App. 642, 645 (1) (188 SE2d 800) (1972).

Decided June 20, 2007. Michael O. Horgan, for appellant. Kopecky & Roberts, James I. Roberts, for appellee.

In light of the foregoing, the superior court did not err in dismissing the mother’s appeal from the probate court’s award of a year’s support to Ms. Booker.

Judgment affirmed.

Smith, P. J., concurs. Barnes, C. J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re: Estate of Billy Rogers
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013
In re Estate of Rogers
748 S.E.2d 505 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)
Booker v. Booker
648 S.E.2d 445 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
648 S.E.2d 445, 286 Ga. App. 6, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 1999, 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booker-v-booker-gactapp-2007.