Bonham v. Hamilton
Opinion
BONHAM ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF HAMILTON, APPELLEE. [Cite as Bonham v. Hamilton, 116 Ohio St.3d 1222, 2007-Ohio-6748.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently accepted.
(No. 2007-0459 — Submitted November 28, 2007 — Decided December 20, 2007.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Butler County, No. CA2006-02-030, 2007-Ohio-349.
{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., dissents. O’DONNELL, J., not participating.
John W. Uhl, for appellants. Millikin & Fitton Law Firm, Michael A. Fulton, and Steven A. Tooman, for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2007 Ohio 6748 (Bonham v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.