Bonham v. Hamilton

868 N.E.2d 679, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1424
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 20, 2007
Docket2007-0459
StatusPublished

This text of 868 N.E.2d 679 (Bonham v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bonham v. Hamilton, 868 N.E.2d 679, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1424 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

Butler App. No. CA2006-02-030, 2007-Ohio-349. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2006-1262, Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs., Huron Cty. Park Dist., Huron App. No. H-05-018, 2006-Ohio-2488; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, J., would accept the appeal without holding. Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bonham v. City of Hamilton, Unpublished Decision (1-29-2007)
2007 Ohio 349 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs., Unpublished Decision (5-19-2006)
2006 Ohio 2488 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
868 N.E.2d 679, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonham-v-hamilton-ohio-2007.