Bonham v. City of Hamilton

879 N.E.2d 775, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1222

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 20, 2007·No. No. 2007-0459·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bonham v. City of Hamilton, 879 N.E.2d 775, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1222 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

879 N.E.2d 775 (Bonham v. City of Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.