Bonham v. City of Hamilton

879 N.E.2d 775, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1222
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 20, 2007
DocketNo. 2007-0459
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 879 N.E.2d 775 (Bonham v. City of Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bonham v. City of Hamilton, 879 N.E.2d 775, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1222 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schlabach v. Kondik
2017 Ohio 8016 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017)
Bonham v. Hamilton
881 N.E.2d 275 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
879 N.E.2d 775, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonham-v-city-of-hamilton-ohio-2007.