Bonham v. Hamilton

868 N.E.2d 679, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1424
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bonham v. Hamilton. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Ohio 6748
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 20, 2007·No. 2007-0459·Published

Opinion

Butler App. No. CA2006-02-030, 2007-Ohio-349. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2006-1262, Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs., Huron Cty. Park Dist., Huron App. No. H-05-018, 2006-Ohio-2488; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, J., would accept the appeal without holding. Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bonham v. Hamilton, 868 N.E.2d 679, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1424 (Ohio 2007).

868 N.E.2d 679 (Bonham v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bonham v. City of Hamilton, Unpublished Decision (1-29-2007)
2007 Ohio 349 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs., Unpublished Decision (5-19-2006)
2006 Ohio 2488 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)