Bolden v. Fischer, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility
543 U.S. 916, 125 S. Ct. 137, 160 L. Ed. 2d 200, 73 U.S.L.W. 3214, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 6223
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 4, 2004
Docket04-6075
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases
This text of 543 U.S. 916 (Bolden v. Fischer, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bolden v. Fischer, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility, 543 U.S. 916, 125 S. Ct. 137, 160 L. Ed. 2d 200, 73 U.S.L.W. 3214, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 6223 (2004).
Opinion
543 U.S. 916
BOLDEN
v.
FISCHER, SUPERINTENDENT, SING SING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ET AL.
No. 04-6075.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 2004.
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 93 Fed. Appx. 322.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ratliff v. Hedgepeth
712 F. Supp. 2d 1038 (C.D. California, 2010)
Simmermon v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.
953 A.2d 478 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2008)
Lamarque v. Fairbanks Capital Corp.
927 A.2d 753 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2007)
Alexander Cruz Ayala v. U.S. Attorney General
201 F. App'x 701 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
Edwin Orlando Hernandez v. U.S. Attorney General
189 F. App'x 899 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
Tomasa Ayasta v. U.S. Attorney General
170 F. App'x 115 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
Magda Catalina Merino Barreto v. U.S. Atty. Gen.
164 F. App'x 890 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
Chao Jin Chen v. U.S. Attorney General
159 F. App'x 962 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Ralbovsky v. Kane
407 F. Supp. 2d 1142 (C.D. California, 2005)
Erdong Zheng v. U.S. Attorney General
157 F. App'x 250 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Ejaz Ahmed Shah v. U.S. Attorney General
151 F. App'x 748 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Anhelina Semenchuk v. U.S. Atty. Gen.
140 F. App'x 925 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Luis Fernando Osorio v. U.S. Atty. Gen.
140 F. App'x 193 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Fernando Pinzon v. U.S. Attorney General
138 F. App'x 176 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Fried Glenn Sumampouw v. U.S. Atty. Gen.
134 F. App'x 373 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Harold Becerra-Rojas v. U.S. Attorney General
130 F. App'x 450 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Agni Gwiuby Arango-Enriquez v. U.S. Atty. Gen.
128 F. App'x 101 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Sandra P. Agredo-Munoz v. U.S. Atty. Gen.
133 F. App'x 596 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
543 U.S. 916, 125 S. Ct. 137, 160 L. Ed. 2d 200, 73 U.S.L.W. 3214, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 6223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolden-v-fischer-superintendent-sing-sing-correctional-facility-scotus-2004.