Bolden v. Greiner

93 F. App'x 322
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedApril 1, 2004
DocketNo. 03-210
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 93 F. App'x 322 (Bolden v. Greiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bolden v. Greiner, 93 F. App'x 322 (2d Cir. 2004).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Shawnon Bolden appeals from a judgment entered in the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mark D. Fox and dismissing Bolden’s second amended complaint. Bolden brought a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that, after he filed a federal habeas petition, Charles Greiner, the Superintendent of the Sing Sing Correctional Facility, impeded his access to the courts by deliberately delaying service of an affidavit opposing Bolden’s petition until after the deadline had passed to file a reply to that affidavit. Judge Fox recommended dismissal of Bolden’s claim on the ground that Bolden had not raised any nonfrivolous claims that were improperly impeded by Greiner’s conduct.

For substantially the reasons stated in Judge Fox’s Report and Recommendation, which was adopted by the District Court, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

We have considered all of the plaintiffs claims on appeal and we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 F. App'x 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolden-v-greiner-ca2-2004.