Boggess v. Cox

48 Mo. 278
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJuly 15, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 48 Mo. 278 (Boggess v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boggess v. Cox, 48 Mo. 278 (Mo. 1871).

Opinion

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The District Court dismissed the writ of error in this case on the ground that, there was no final judgment rendered in the Circuit Court.

Upon the trial the plaintiffs offered a deed in evidence, and it being excluded by the court, they took a nonsuit, with leave to move to set the same aside; and upon a motion to set the nonsuit aside being overruled they excepted, wherefore the court gave judgment against them for costs, 'and this was the only judgment rendered in this cause.

It is well settled that a judgment for costs only is not a final judgment, and will not support an appeal or writ, of error. Nor is there any difference between a final judgment, rendered on a nonsuit and in any other case. Where a nonsuit is taken, in order to justify an appeal or writ of error the judgment should be formally set out, that it is by the court therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff take nothing by his writ, and that the defendant go thereof without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs,” etc.

The action of the District Court' in dismissing the writ must therefore be affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stith v. J. J. Newberry Co.
79 S.W.2d 447 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1935)
Duval v. Duval
291 S.W. 488 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1927)
Town of Magnolia v. Kays
200 Ill. App. 122 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1916)
Goldring v. Reid
60 Fla. 78 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1910)
Mizell Live Stock Co. v. J. J. McCaskill Co.
57 Fla. 118 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1909)
A. A. Cooper Wagon & Buggy Co. v. Cornell
111 S.W. 521 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1908)
Neyens v. Flesher
79 N.E. 1087 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1907)
Reesman v. Rollinson
82 S.W. 646 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1904)
Schulte v. Kelly
83 N.W. 405 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1900)
Ropes v. Eldridge
39 Fla. 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1897)
Boyle v. Clarke
59 Mo. App. 187 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1894)
Bick v. Seal
39 Mo. App. 567 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1890)
State ex rel. Love v. Newton
26 Mo. App. 11 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)
Moody v. Deutsch
85 Mo. 237 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Bobb v. Graham
15 Mo. App. 289 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1884)
Schmidt v. Halle
15 Mo. App. 36 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1884)
Crockett v. Lewis
66 Mo. 671 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1877)
Conn v. Ferree
60 Mo. 17 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1875)
Dale v. Wright
57 Mo. 110 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1874)
Bowie v. City of Kansas
51 Mo. 454 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Mo. 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boggess-v-cox-mo-1871.