Boyle v. Clarke

59 Mo. App. 187, 1894 Mo. App. LEXIS 421
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 5, 1894·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Ellison, J.

In this case there is only a judgment for costs rendered on the continuance of the cause by the trial court. A motion to retax was filed by defend[188] ant and overruled, whereupon he appealed to this court. There is not to be found in the record any final judgment in the cause and we are riot advised whether the case has ever been disposed of. It is settled by a long line of decisions in this state that a judgment for costs will not support an appeal. Conn v. Ferree, 60 Mo. 17; Boggess v. Cox, 48 Mo. 278; Evans v. Russel, 61 Mo. 37.

Many others might be cited to the same effect. The case should have been finally disposed of, otherwise we may have many appeals on as many different parts of the same case.

The appeal will be dismissed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyle v. Clarke, 59 Mo. App. 187, 1894 Mo. App. LEXIS 421 (Mo. Ct. App. 1894).

59 Mo. App. 187 (Boyle v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Fowler v. Calvird
93 S.W.2d 1106 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1936)
American Surety Co. v. Haynes
101 S.W. 690 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)