Crockett v. Lewis
66 Mo. 671
Opinion
— The record in this case shows no final judgment from which a writ of error can be prosecuted. It shows that the jury retired, and after a short time returned into court their verdict as follows: “.Non Suit.” “ It is therefore considered by the court that the defendant do have and recover against the plaintiffs his costs in this suit laid out and expended, and that he have thereof execution.” The writ of error will, with the concurrence of the other judges, therefore be dismissed under the authority of Boggess v. Cox, 48 Mo. 278.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crockett v. Lewis, 66 Mo. 671 (Mo. 1877).
66 Mo. 671 (Crockett v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
A. A. Cooper Wagon & Buggy Co. v. Cornell
111 S.W. 521 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1908)
Gates v. Solomon
83 S.W. 348 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1904)
Reesman v. Rollinson
82 S.W. 646 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1904)
State ex rel. Love v. Newton
26 Mo. App. 11 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)