Boehm v. Barnaba
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Cobb, J.), entered April 10, 2003 in Greene County, which denied a [912] motion by defendant Uncle Sam Boat Tours, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against it.
Plaintiffs Henry R Boehm and Gordon L. Pebler were struck by a car when they were standing in a public street reading an easel-type sign posted by defendant Uncle Sam Boat Tours, Inc. (hereinafter USBT) on its sidewalk. After the commencement of this personal injury action against defendant Anthony J. Barnaba as the driver of the car, defendant Isadora M. Strabo, as the owner of the car, and USBT, USBT moved for summary judgment proffering the pleadings, bills of particulars, deposition transcripts and the affidavit of Ronald Thomson, its general manager and owner, to demonstrate that it could not be negligent as a matter of law because the accident occurred beyond the bounds of its property where it had no control. Supreme Court denied the motion by finding, among other things, that USBT had a duty to provide its patrons with a reasonably safe approach to its ticket booth and schedule sign. This appeal followed.
USBT asserts that it had no duty to protect Boehm and Pebler from an injury on a public roadway. With “ ‘[1]lability for a dangerous condition on property . . . predicated upon occupancy, ownership, control or a special use
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
7 A.D.3d 911 (Boehm v. Barnaba) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.