Curtis v. City of New York

179 A.D.2d 432
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 14, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 179 A.D.2d 432 (Curtis v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curtis v. City of New York, 179 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants-appellants and the City of New York to recover for personal injuries sustained when he fell after exiting a store located in a building owned by the defendants-appellants. According to plaintiff, he fell because his heel became caught in a hole in the sidewalk abutting the store. A photograph of the location shows that there was a metal rack for newspapers to the right of the doorway of the store, and metal cartons with newspapers on them to the left of the doorway. Both appear to be adjacent to the wall of the building and extend out on to the sidewalk. The defect in the sidewalk that allegedly caused the injury appears in the sidewalk just in front of the rack located to the right of the doorway.

"It is well settled that an owner of land abutting on a public sidewalk does not, solely by reason of being an abutter, owe to the public a duty to keep the sidewalk in a safe condition”. (Kiernan v Thompson, 137 AD2d 957, 958.) However, an owner may be held liable where the abutting owner uses the sidewalk for a "special purpose” (see, Kiernan v Thompson, supra, at 958), or where the cause of the injury is the defective condition of a sidewalk appurtenance installed for the special use or benefit of the owner or occupier of the abutting premises. (See, D’Ambrosio v City of New York, 55 NY2d 454, 462; Appio v City of Albany, 144 AD2d 869, 870.) "Another relevant exception has been recognized where the activities of the abutting owner or occupier created the dangerous condition which caused the injuries” (Appio v City of Albany, supra, at 870). The newspaper racks adjacent to defendants’ premises constituted a special use of the sidewalk for their benefit as owners of the premises, which defined the plaintiff’s path and in effect directed him towards the defect in the sidewalk that caused him to fall (cf., Ryan v Gordon L. Hayes, Inc., 17 NY2d 765; Donovan v Bender, 11 AD2d 735, affd 9 NY2d 854). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Padarat v. New York City Tr. Auth.
2019 NY Slip Op 6406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
ZARNOCH, JERAD M. v. WILLIAMS, JEFFREY J.
83 A.D.3d 1373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
McKenzie v. Columbus Centre
40 A.D.3d 312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Hunter v. City of New York
23 A.D.3d 223 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Boehm v. Barnaba
7 A.D.3d 911 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Spangel v. City of New York
285 A.D.2d 425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Betances v. 700 West 176th St. Realty Corp.
250 A.D.2d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
LaManna v. MJ Cahn Woolen Co.
249 A.D.2d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Minott v. City of New York
230 A.D.2d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Darnovsky v. Unusual Restaurant, Inc.
221 A.D.2d 151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
MacLeod v. Pete's Tavern, Inc.
218 A.D.2d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Granville v. City of New York
211 A.D.2d 195 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Marsico v. Brennan
162 Misc. 2d 666 (New York Supreme Court, 1994)
Gage v. City of New York
203 A.D.2d 118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 A.D.2d 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1992.