Blaustein v. Harrison

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Blaustein v. Harrison

286 S.E.2d 758, 160 Ga. App. 256, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2967

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 14, 1981

Docket62569

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 286 S.E.2d 758 (Blaustein v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blaustein v. Harrison, 286 S.E.2d 758, 160 Ga. App. 256, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2967 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

This medical malpractice action was initially filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, where it was dismissed for lack of diversity jurisdiction. Within six months of *257 this dismissal, but more than two years after accrual of the cause of action, the plaintiff refiled the suit in the Superior Court of Fulton County. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendant based on the running of statute of limitation (Code Ann. § 3-1102; Ga. L. 1976, pp. 1363, 1364). The plaintiff appeals, contending that she was authorized under Code Ann. § 3-808 to refile the suit within six months of the dismissal in federal court. Held:

Decided October 14, 1981 Rehearing denied October 30, 1981 Robert John White, for appellant. Robert G. Tanner, for appellee.

Code Ann. § 3-808 (as amended through Ga. L. 1967, pp. 226, 244) provides as follows: “If a plaintiff shall discontinue or dismiss his case, and shall recommence within six months, such renewed case shall stand upon the same footing, as to limitation, with the original case; but this privilege of dismissal and renewal shall be exercised only once under this section.” It has been held repeatedly that this rule does not apply where the original filing is in federal court. See Henson v. Columbus Bank &c. Co., 144 Ga. App. 80 (4) (240 SE2d 284) (1977), and cases cited therein. We reject the plaintiffs contention that such an interpretation of the statute is unconstitutional, given that it is based upon Supreme Court precedent. See, e.g., Constitution Pub. Co. v. DeLaughter, 95 Ga. 17 (21 SE 1000) (1894); Webb v. Southern Cotton Oil Co., 131 Ga. 682 (63 SE 135) (1908).

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banke, Judge.

This medical malpractice action was initially filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, where it was dismissed for lack of diversity jurisdiction. Within six months of *257 this dismissal, but more than two years after accrual of the cause of action, the plaintiff refiled the suit in the Superior Court of Fulton County. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendant based on the running of statute of limitation (Code Ann. § 3-1102; Ga. L. 1976, pp. 1363, 1364). The plaintiff appeals, contending that she was authorized under Code Ann. § 3-808 to refile the suit within six months of the dismissal in federal court. Held:

Decided October 14, 1981 Rehearing denied October 30, 1981 Robert John White, for appellant. Robert G. Tanner, for appellee.

Code Ann. § 3-808 (as amended through Ga. L. 1967, pp. 226, 244) provides as follows: “If a plaintiff shall discontinue or dismiss his case, and shall recommence within six months, such renewed case shall stand upon the same footing, as to limitation, with the original case; but this privilege of dismissal and renewal shall be exercised only once under this section.” It has been held repeatedly that this rule does not apply where the original filing is in federal court. See Henson v. Columbus Bank &c. Co., 144 Ga. App. 80 (4) (240 SE2d 284) (1977), and cases cited therein. We reject the plaintiffs contention that such an interpretation of the statute is unconstitutional, given that it is based upon Supreme Court precedent. See, e.g., Constitution Pub. Co. v. DeLaughter, 95 Ga. 17 (21 SE 1000) (1894); Webb v. Southern Cotton Oil Co., 131 Ga. 682 (63 SE 135) (1908).

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 S.E.2d 758, 160 Ga. App. 256, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blaustein-v-harrison-gactapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack