Blanco v. United States

184 F.2d 117, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3048
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 17, 1950·No. 12508·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an o'rder which granted a motion to dismiss an action, but did not dismiss it. Such an order is not a *118 final decision, within the meaning of 28 U. S.C.A.. § 1291, and is not appealable. Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 8; Turnbull v. Cyr, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 117. See, also, City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 9 F.2d 390; Wright v. Gibson, 9 Cir., 128 F. 2d 865; Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians etc., v. Olson, 9 Cir., 144 F.2d 347; Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 850; Cashion v. Bunn, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 969. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blanco v. United States, 184 F.2d 117, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3048 (9th Cir. 1950).

184 F.2d 117 (Blanco v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fern v. United States
213 F.2d 674 (Ninth Circuit, 1954)
United States v. State of Arizona
206 F.2d 159 (Ninth Circuit, 1953)
Monge v. Smyth
198 F.2d 749 (Ninth Circuit, 1952)
Newman v. State of California
184 F.2d 515 (Ninth Circuit, 1950)