Blanco v. United States
This text of 184 F.2d 117 (Blanco v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from an o'rder which granted a motion to dismiss an action, but did not dismiss it. Such an order is not a *118 final decision, within the meaning of 28 U. S.C.A.. § 1291, and is not appealable. Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 8; Turnbull v. Cyr, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 117. See, also, City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 9 F.2d 390; Wright v. Gibson, 9 Cir., 128 F. 2d 865; Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians etc., v. Olson, 9 Cir., 144 F.2d 347; Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 850; Cashion v. Bunn, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 969. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Mandate to issue forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 F.2d 117, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanco-v-united-states-ca9-1950.