Cashion v. Bunn

Ninth Circuit

Cashion v. Bunn

149 F.2d 969, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2725

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 29, 1945·No. No. 10888·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by appellants againsfappellees. The complaint contained two1 counts entitled, respectively, “First cause of action” and “Second cause of action.” Appellees moved for a summary judgment dismissing the first count. The court heard the motion and, on May 1, 1944, entered the following order: “It is ordered that summary judgment be had by defendants [appellees] on the first cause of action of the complaint herein.”

No judgment was entered. On July 25, 1944, appellants appealed from the order of May 1, 1944. That order was not a final decision, within the meaning of § 128(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 225 (a), and was not appealable. Wright v. Gibson, 9 Cir., 128 F.2d 865, 867.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by appellants againsfappellees. The complaint contained two1 counts entitled, respectively, “First cause of action” and “Second cause of action.” Appellees moved for a summary judgment dismissing the first count. The court heard the motion and, on May 1, 1944, entered the following order: “It is ordered that summary judgment be had by defendants [appellees] on the first cause of action of the complaint herein.”

No judgment was entered. On July 25, 1944, appellants appealed from the order of May 1, 1944. That order was not a final decision, within the meaning of § 128(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 225 (a), and was not appealable. Wright v. Gibson, 9 Cir., 128 F.2d 865, 867.

Appeal dismissed.

Cashion v. Bunn, 149 F.2d 969, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2725 (9th Cir. 1945).

Pincite

149 F.2d 969 (Cashion v. Bunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related