Turnbull v. Cyr

184 F.2d 117
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 15, 1950·No. 12493·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order which granted a motion to dismiss a complaint, but did not dismiss it. Such an order is not a final decision, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291, and is not appealable. Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 8. See, also, City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 9 F.2d 390; Wright v. Gibson, 9 Cir., 128 F.2d 865; Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians v. Olson, 9 Cir., 144 F.2d 347; Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 850; Cashion v. Bunn, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d ,969. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turnbull v. Cyr, 184 F.2d 117 (9th Cir. 1950).

184 F.2d 117 (Turnbull v. Cyr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schwertfeger v. Constant
109 So. 2d 173 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Renard v. Kirkeby Hotels
99 So. 2d 719 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Fern v. United States
213 F.2d 674 (Ninth Circuit, 1954)
United States v. State of Arizona
206 F.2d 159 (Ninth Circuit, 1953)
Monge v. Smyth
198 F.2d 749 (Ninth Circuit, 1952)
Blanco v. United States
184 F.2d 117 (Ninth Circuit, 1950)