Bishop v. Furtado

444 U.S. 1035, 100 S. Ct. 710, 62 L. Ed. 2d 672, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 492
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 14, 1980·No. No. 79-666·Published·Cited by 141 cases

Opinion

C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bishop v. Furtado, 444 U.S. 1035, 100 S. Ct. 710, 62 L. Ed. 2d 672, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 492 (1980).

444 U.S. 1035 (Bishop v. Furtado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banks v. Gallagher
686 F. Supp. 2d 499 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2009)
Windstead v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia, 2009
State v. Webster
2000 UT App 238 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2001)
L.A. Ray Realty v. Town Council of the Town of Cumberland
698 A.2d 202 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1997)
Lewis v. Velez
149 F.R.D. 474 (S.D. New York, 1993)
McCann v. Ruiz
802 F. Supp. 606 (D. Puerto Rico, 1992)
Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. Madigan
958 F.2d 1479 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Mutuelles Unies v. Kroll & Linstrom
957 F.2d 707 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles
773 F. Supp. 204 (C.D. California, 1991)
Patterson v. Coughlin
722 F. Supp. 9 (W.D. New York, 1989)
United States v. Doe
860 F.2d 488 (First Circuit, 1988)
Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon
697 F. Supp. 51 (D. Puerto Rico, 1988)
Backman v. Polaroid Corporation
677 F. Supp. 50 (D. Massachusetts, 1987)
National Bank of Fairhaven v. United States
660 F. Supp. 125 (D. Massachusetts, 1987)
Lodestar Co. v. County of Mono
639 F. Supp. 1439 (E.D. California, 1986)