Bioresource Inc v. City of Detroit

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bioresource Inc v. City of Detroit. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 1004
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 29, 2007·No. 132177·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

132177 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan BIORESOURCE, INC., Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman, Justices and OPPMAC, INC.,

Intervening Plaintiff,

v SC: 132177

COA: 266668

Wayne CC: 01-123531-CH

CITY OF DETROIT, JOSEPH VASSALLO,

PAUL BERNARD, and FREDERICK ROTTACH,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

CENTRAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES, INC.,

SAM FODALE, JERRY FODALE, STATE OF

MICHIGAN, and DIAMOND DISMANTLING,

INC.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 29, 2007 _________________________________________ t0122 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bioresource Inc v. City of Detroit, (Mich. 2007).

Bioresource Inc v. City of Detroit (Bioresource Inc v. City of Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.