Bioresource Inc v. City of Detroit

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bioresource Inc v. City of Detroit. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 1004
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 2006·No. 130204·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

130204 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan BIORESOURCE, INC., Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman, Justices

and OPPMAC, INC.,

Intervening

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130204

COA: 266668

Wayne CC: 01-123531-CH

CITY OF DETROIT, JOE

VASSALLO, PAUL BERNARD,

and FREDERICK ROTTACH,

Defendants-Appellants, and CENTRAL MAINTENANCE

SERVICES, INC., SAM FODALE,

JERRY FODALE, STATE OF

MICHIGAN, and DIAMOND

DISMANTLING, INC.,

Defendants. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 27, 2006 _________________________________________ l0221 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bioresource Inc v. City of Detroit, (Mich. 2006).

Bioresource Inc v. City of Detroit (Bioresource Inc v. City of Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.