Bioresource Inc v. City of Detroit
This text of Bioresource Inc v. City of Detroit (Bioresource Inc v. City of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130204 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan BIORESOURCE, INC., Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman, Justices
and OPPMAC, INC.,
Intervening
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v SC: 130204
COA: 266668
Wayne CC: 01-123531-CH
CITY OF DETROIT, JOE
VASSALLO, PAUL BERNARD,
and FREDERICK ROTTACH,
Defendants-Appellants, and CENTRAL MAINTENANCE
SERVICES, INC., SAM FODALE,
JERRY FODALE, STATE OF
MICHIGAN, and DIAMOND
DISMANTLING, INC.,
Defendants. _________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 27, 2006 _________________________________________ l0221 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bioresource Inc v. City of Detroit, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bioresource-inc-v-city-of-detroit-mich-2006.