BIORESOURCE, INC. v. City of Detroit
726 N.W.2d 37, 477 Mich. 1004
This text of 726 N.W.2d 37 (BIORESOURCE, INC. v. City of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
BIORESOURCE, INC. v. City of Detroit, 726 N.W.2d 37, 477 Mich. 1004 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
BIORESOURCE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Oppmac, Inc., Intervening Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF DETROIT, Joseph Vassallo, Paul Bernard, and Frederick Rottach, Defendants-Appellees, and
Central Maintenance Services, Inc., Sam Fodale, Jerry Fodale, State of Michigan, and Diamond Dismantling, Inc., Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. DOGGENDORF
726 N.W.2d 37 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
726 N.W.2d 37, 477 Mich. 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bioresource-inc-v-city-of-detroit-mich-2007.