BIORESOURCE, INC. v. City of Detroit
726 N.W.2d 37, 477 Mich. 1004
Opinion
BIORESOURCE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Oppmac, Inc., Intervening Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF DETROIT, Joseph Vassallo, Paul Bernard, and Frederick Rottach, Defendants-Appellees, and
Central Maintenance Services, Inc., Sam Fodale, Jerry Fodale, State of Michigan, and Diamond Dismantling, Inc., Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
BIORESOURCE, INC. v. City of Detroit, 726 N.W.2d 37, 477 Mich. 1004 (Mich. 2007).
726 N.W.2d 37 (BIORESOURCE, INC. v. City of Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. DOGGENDORF
726 N.W.2d 37 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)