Betallic, Inc. v. Deavours

439 S.E.2d 643, 263 Ga. 796
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 24, 1994
DocketS93G0910
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 439 S.E.2d 643 (Betallic, Inc. v. Deavours) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Betallic, Inc. v. Deavours, 439 S.E.2d 643, 263 Ga. 796 (Ga. 1994).

Opinions

Sears-Collins, Justice.

We agree with the Court of Appeals’ conclusion in this case and with that court’s construction of OCGA § 9-15-14, except that part where the court finds that a claim for litigation costs and attorney [797]*797fees assessed for frivolous actions and defenses is available only to a “prevailing party.” Deavours v. Hog Mtn. Creations, 207 Ga. App. 557 (428 SE2d 388) (1993). OCGA § 9-15-14 does not limit recovery to a certain party, but permits any party to recover from another party who has “unnecessarily expanded the proceeding by . . . improper conduct, including, but not limited to, abuses of discovery.” OCGA § 9-15-14 (b).

Judgment affirmed.

Clarke, C. J., Hunt, P. J., Fletcher and Sears-Collins, JJ., concur; Benham, J., concurs in the judgment only; Hunstein, J., and Judge William H. Ison dissent. Carley, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carla Graham v. Lisa Graham
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
McCLURE v. McCURRY Et Al.
765 S.E.2d 30 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)
Robinson v. Glass
691 S.E.2d 620 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)
Brewer v. Paulk
673 S.E.2d 545 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Vaughters v. Outlaw
668 S.E.2d 13 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Freeman v. Wheeler
627 S.E.2d 86 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Ordner Construction Co. v. Parkside Crossing, 300, LLC
624 S.E.2d 206 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2005)
Reese v. Grant
596 S.E.2d 139 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2004)
Dismer v. Luke
492 S.E.2d 562 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Hallman v. Emory University
483 S.E.2d 362 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Generali — U. S. Branch v. Owens
462 S.E.2d 464 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Moore v. Dixon
452 S.E.2d 484 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)
Hamil v. Stanford
449 S.E.2d 118 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)
Deavours v. Hog Mountain Creations, Inc.
445 S.E.2d 579 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
FAIRBURN BANKING COMPANY v. Gafford
439 S.E.2d 482 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)
McCullough v. McCullough
439 S.E.2d 486 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)
Betallic, Inc. v. Deavours
439 S.E.2d 643 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
439 S.E.2d 643, 263 Ga. 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/betallic-inc-v-deavours-ga-1994.