Bess v. Village of East Hampton

225 A.D.2d 511, 639 N.Y.2d 718, 639 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1878
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 225 A.D.2d 511 (Bess v. Village of East Hampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bess v. Village of East Hampton, 225 A.D.2d 511, 639 N.Y.2d 718, 639 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Since the record supports the Supreme Court’s finding that the defendant did not receive the requisite written notice of the alleged defective condition, and there was no evidence that the defendant affirmatively created the condition, summary judgment was properly awarded in favor of the defendant (see, [512]*512Village Law § 6-628; Mollahan v Village of Port Washington N., 153 AD2d 881; Conlon v Village of Pleasantville, 146 AD2d 736; Parella v Levin, 111 AD2d 750). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stern v. Inc. Village of Flower Hill
278 A.D.2d 225 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Amarante v. Village of Tarrytown
226 A.D.2d 488 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 511, 639 N.Y.2d 718, 639 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bess-v-village-of-east-hampton-nyappdiv-1996.