Bess v. Village of East Hampton
225 A.D.2d 511, 639 N.Y.2d 718, 639 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1878
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Since the record supports the Supreme Court’s finding that the defendant did not receive the requisite written notice of the alleged defective condition, and there was no evidence that the defendant affirmatively created the condition, summary judgment was properly awarded in favor of the defendant (see, [512] Village Law § 6-628; Mollahan v Village of Port Washington N., 153 AD2d 881; Conlon v Village of Pleasantville, 146 AD2d 736; Parella v Levin, 111 AD2d 750). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bess v. Village of East Hampton, 225 A.D.2d 511, 639 N.Y.2d 718, 639 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 511 (Bess v. Village of East Hampton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stern v. Inc. Village of Flower Hill
278 A.D.2d 225 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Amarante v. Village of Tarrytown
226 A.D.2d 488 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)