Berry v. Locke

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Berry v. Locke. Read the opinion of the Court — 331 F. App'x 237
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2009·No. 09-1875·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1875

RENEE R. BERRY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GARY LOCKE, Secretary, Department of Commerce,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

CARLOS M. GUTIERREZ, Secretary, Department of Commerce,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00697-JCC-TRJ)

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 17, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Renee R. Berry, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Renee R. Berry appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice Berry’s civil complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Berry v.

Locke, No. 1:08-cv-00697-JCC-TRJ (E.D. Va. June 5, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berry v. Locke, (4th Cir. 2009).

Berry v. Locke (Berry v. Locke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.