Berry v. Locke
This text of Berry v. Locke (Berry v. Locke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1084
RENEE R. BERRY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GARY LOCKE, Secretary, Department of Commerce,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00459-JCC-TRJ)
Submitted: July 27, 2009 Decided: August 17, 2009
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Renee R. Berry, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Renee R. Berry appeals the district court’s order
granting the Defendant's motion to dismiss and dismissing her
civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Berry v. Locke, No. 1:08-cv-00459-JCC-
TRJ (E.D. Va. Nov. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Berry v. Locke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-locke-ca4-2009.