Berry v. Locke

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 17, 2009
Docket09-1084
StatusUnpublished

This text of Berry v. Locke (Berry v. Locke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berry v. Locke, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1084

RENEE R. BERRY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GARY LOCKE, Secretary, Department of Commerce,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00459-JCC-TRJ)

Submitted: July 27, 2009 Decided: August 17, 2009

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Renee R. Berry, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Renee R. Berry appeals the district court’s order

granting the Defendant's motion to dismiss and dismissing her

civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Berry v. Locke, No. 1:08-cv-00459-JCC-

TRJ (E.D. Va. Nov. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Berry v. Locke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-locke-ca4-2009.