Berry v. Locke

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Berry v. Locke. Read the opinion of the Court — 331 F. App'x 237
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 17, 2009·No. 09-1084·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1084

RENEE R. BERRY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GARY LOCKE, Secretary, Department of Commerce,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00459-JCC-TRJ)

Submitted: July 27, 2009 Decided: August 17, 2009

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Renee R. Berry, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Renee R. Berry appeals the district court’s order

granting the Defendant's motion to dismiss and dismissing her

civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Berry v. Locke, No. 1:08-cv-00459-JCC-

TRJ (E.D. Va. Nov. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berry v. Locke, (4th Cir. 2009).

Berry v. Locke (Berry v. Locke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.