Bernreither v. . City of New York
89 N.E. 1096, 196 N.Y. 506, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 856
Opinion
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts, upon the ground that the notice of intention to sue required by the act of 1886, and the demand required by the provisions of the city charter are concurrent in their obligations, both being conditions precedent to the right to maintain the action; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Taking no part: Haight, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bernreither v. . City of New York, 89 N.E. 1096, 196 N.Y. 506, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 856 (N.Y. 1909).
89 N.E. 1096 (Bernreither v. . City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
509 Sixth Avenue Corp. v. New York City Transit Authority
24 A.D.2d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Gonzales v. New York City Housing Authority
23 Misc. 2d 36 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
McGuire v. City of New York
3 Misc. 2d 569 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
Joseph v. McVeigh
285 A.D. 386 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
Javet v. City of New York
187 Misc. 841 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
Zimmerman v. City of New York
183 Misc. 298 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1944)
Felder v. George H. Flinn Corp.
181 Misc. 119 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
Kamnitzer v. City of New York
265 A.D. 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)
McGovern v. City of New York
160 Misc. 714 (New York Supreme Court, 1935)
Flaxman v. City of New York
98 Misc. 88 (New York Supreme Court, 1916)
Wesley v. City of New York
151 N.Y.S. 587 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Tolchinsky v. City of New York
164 A.D. 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
McCarthy v. City of New York
84 Misc. 439 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Conway v. City of New York
139 A.D. 446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
In re the Opening of Richard Street
138 A.D. 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)