Wesley v. City of New York

151 N.Y.S. 587
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 4, 1915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The notice of claim filed with the comptroller in this case was a substantial compliance with the provisions of section 261 of the Greater New York Charter, save in one particular. It is fatally defective in that it contains no notice of intention to commence an action thereon. Bernreither v. City of New York, 196 N. Y. 506, 89 N. E. 1096, affirming same case 123 App. Div. 291, 107 N. Y. Supp. 1006; Wagner v. City of New York, 160 App. Div. 586, 145 N. Y. Supp. 683; Forsyth v. Oswego, 191 N. Y. 441, 84 N. E. 392, 123 Am. St. Rep. 605; Purdy v. City of New York, 193 N. Y. 521, 86 N. E. 560.

Although the record discloses a case of great hardship, we cannot do otherwise than follow the decisions upon the point involved. The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wesley v. City of New York, 151 N.Y.S. 587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

151 N.Y.S. 587 (Wesley v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wesley v. City of New York
152 N.Y.S. 1148 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)