Bennett v. State

254 S.W. 949, 95 Tex. Crim. 422, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 626
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 23, 1923·No. No. 7493.·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

Appeal is from a conviction for selling intoxicating liquor, with a penalty of two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has filed application for certiorari to correct the transcript, pointing out many alleged mistakes and errors therein, and asserting that it is impossible for him to brief his case in the present condition of the record. The errors appear to be attributable to the carelessness of the clerk in preparing the transcript for this court. We must enjoin upon such officers more care in the preparation of records to the end that useless delays may be avoided.

The certiorari is granted as prayed for.

Certiorari granted.

MORROW, PRESIDING JUDGE, absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. State, 254 S.W. 949, 95 Tex. Crim. 422, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 626 (Tex. 1923).

254 S.W. 949 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mincy v. State
78 So. 2d 262 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Gandy v. State
140 S.W.2d 182 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Lennon v. State
26 S.W.2d 227 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Blake v. State
7 S.W.2d 579 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Mitchell v. State
6 S.W.2d 753 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Minor v. State
299 S.W. 422 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Gray v. State
269 S.W. 1056 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Pearson v. State
254 S.W. 953 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)