Pearson v. State

257 S.W. 895, 96 Tex. Crim. 453
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 30, 1924
DocketNo. 7590
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 257 S.W. 895 (Pearson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearson v. State, 257 S.W. 895, 96 Tex. Crim. 453 (Tex. 1924).

Opinion

MOEROW, P. J.

The indictment consisting of a single count charges the offense of unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor. That issue was submitted to the jury in the court’s charge, the verdict found appellant guilty of that offense, and of that offense the court in receiving and recording the verdict expressly declared him guilty. On this motion it is shown that appellant is condemned to the penitentiary for the offense of selling intoxicating liquor. In article 938, Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P., it is declared that “the Court of Criminal Appeals may reform and correct as the law and the nature of the case may require.” When the data necessary to enable the court to correct an improperly entered judgment is revealed by the record, this court has reformed the sentence on many occasions. In Small’s Case (Tex. Cr. App.) 38 S. W. 798, the majority opinion held to the contrary. That ruling was expressly rejected in Burk’s Case (Tex. Cr. App.) 55 S. W. 826. The latter view is in accord with the opinion of this court in River’s Case, 10 Tex. App. 177; Robinson v. State, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 550, 126 S. W. 276, and many other cases collated in Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. C. § 668, and in Vernon’s Tex. Crim. Stat. vol. 2, p. 900.

The sentence is reformed to agree with the indictment, verdict, and judgment sentencing the appellant to confinement in the penitentiary for a period of- one year for the offense of unlawfully transporting liquor. In other respects the motion is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawrence v. State
36 S.W.2d 1018 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Martini v. State
280 S.W. 804 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Smiddy v. State
274 S.W. 602 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Barr v. State
271 S.W. 624 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 S.W. 895, 96 Tex. Crim. 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-state-texcrimapp-1924.