Bennett v. State
This text of 280 S.W. 594 (Bennett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This appeal is from a conviction for manslaughter in the District Court of Guadalupe County, with punishment at two years in the penitentiary.
We cannot consider the statement of facts and bills of exception in his case because filed too late. The trial term of the court below adjourned on May 22, 1925. Appellant was given, by an order of the. court, ninety days in which to file his statement of facts and bills of exception. This is the limit allowed by law. Art. 845 Vernon’s C. C. P.; Maxwell v. State, 153 S. W. Rep. 324; Romero v. State, 72 Tex. Crim. Rep. 105; Vickers v. State, 236 S. W. Rep. 483; Williams v. State, 237 5. W. Rep. 920. The trial court has no power to extend the time beyond ninety days. Robeson v. State, 260 S. W. Rep. 578. The bills of exception and statement of facts were filed on August 22, 1925, same being ninety-second day after the adjournment of the court. Ninety-one full days elapsed between the day of adjournment and the day of such filing. The indictment appearing regular, and the charge of the court seeming to adequately present the offense therein set forth and those included, the judgment must be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
280 S.W. 594, 103 Tex. Crim. 279, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-state-texcrimapp-1926.