Beniquez v. Johnson
This text of Beniquez v. Johnson (Beniquez v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ Petitioner, 21 CIVIL 1467 (PAE) -against- JUDGMENT JAY JOHNSON. Respondent. wa K
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated June 12, 2023, the Court denies Beniquez's February 18, 2021 petition for a writ of habeas corpus The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Beniquez has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a federal right. Appellate review is therefore not warranted. Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005); 28 ULS.C. § 2253. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962).; accordingly, the case is closed.
Dated: New York, New York June 12, 2023
RUBY J. KRAJICK
— ClerkofCourt BY: CR Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Beniquez v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beniquez-v-johnson-nysd-2023.