Belle v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 9, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-00836·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 2/9/20 23 WENDELL BELLE, Movant, 23-CV-0836 (VEC) -against- 15-CR-0537-3 (VEC) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ORDER Respondent. VALERIE E. CAPRONI, United States District Judge: Movant Wendell Belle, who is currently incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York, brings this pro se motion, which he labels as a “Motion for Consideration,” expressing his intention to challenge the legality of his sentence entered in United States v. Belle, No. 15-CR-0537-3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 23, 2021). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Movant 60 days’ leave to file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. STANDARD OF REVIEW A prisoner in federal custody may bring a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 attacking his

conviction or sentence on the grounds that it violates the Constitution or United States law, was imposed without jurisdiction, exceeds the maximum penalty, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack. 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Under Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, the Court has the authority to review and deny a Section 2255 motion before directing an answer “[i]f it plainly appears from the motion, any attached exhibits, and the record of prior proceedings that the moving party is not entitled to relief.” Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, Rule 4(b); see Acosta v. Nunez, 221 F.3d 117, 123 (2d Cir. 2000). The Court is obliged, however, to construe pro se pleadings liberally and interpret them “to raise the strongest arguments they suggest.” Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 474 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) (emphasis in original); see Green v. United States, 260 F.3d 78, 83 (2d Cir. 2001). Nevertheless, a pro se litigant is not exempt “from compliance with relevant rules of procedural and substantive law.” Triestman, 470 F.3d at 477 (citing Traguth v. Zuck, 710 F.2d 90, 95 (2d Cir. 1983)). BACKGROUND

On January 9, 2023, the Court received from Movant a submission labeled “Motion for Consideration.” In his submission, Movant expresses his intent to challenge his conviction and sentence in a Section 2255 motion. He alleges that he was transferred from state to federal custody on November 23, 2022, and that while he was in state custody, he did not have access to “books or [a] computer system to study any federal law.” (ECF 1, at 3.) Only upon admission into federal custody did Movant learn that he could file a postconviction motion under Section 2255 and that he had only one year to file any such motion. He states that he needs additional time to “study his case” and therefore “the one-year date from sentencing to file may[] not be met.” (Id. at 3.) By memo endorsement dated January 31, 2023, the Court directed the Clerk of

Court to open a new civil action for Movant’s Section 2255 motion, and to docket his submission in the new action. Movant was convicted in a judgment of conviction entered on February 23, 2021. United States v. Belle, ECF 1:15-CR-0537, 1621 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 23, 2021). Movant appealed his conviction, and on August 19, 2022, the Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. See No. 21- 544 (L). Movant’s conviction became final on or around November 17, 2022, at the expiration of the 90-day period to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court. See Sup. Ct. R. 13.1. It therefore appears that has one year from on or around November 17, 2022, that is, until approximately November 17, 2023, to file a timely Section 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f). DISCUSSION Under Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, a Section 2255 motion must (1) specify all the grounds for relief available to the moving party; (2) state the facts supporting each ground; (3) state the relief requested; (4) be printed, typewritten, or legibly handwritten; and (5) be signed under penalty of perjury by the movant or by a person authorized to sign it for the movant. A motion must permit the Court and the respondent to comprehend both the movant’s grounds for relief and the underlying facts and legal theory supporting each ground so that the issues presented in the petition may be adjudicated. Movant’s submission does not conform to the requirements of Rule 2 because it does not state any of his grounds for relief or the facts supporting such grounds for relief. The Court therefore grants Movant 60 days from the date of his order to file a motion under Section 2255 that complies with Rule 2. CONCLUSION The Court grants Movant 60 days’ leave to file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 containing the information specified above. The motion must be submitted to this Court’s Pro Se Office, be captioned as an “Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255,” and bear the same docket number as this order. A Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 form is attached to this order, which Movant should complete as specified above. If Movant fails to comply with this order within the time

allowed, and cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to close this civil action without prejudice to any future Section 2255 motion that Movant may file. Because Movant has not at this time made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status 1s denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 9, 2023 New York, New York \ ( VALERIE E. CAPR ri United States District Judge

Page 1 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence By a Person in Federal Custody (Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255)

Instructions 1. To use this form, you must be a person who is serving a sentence under a judgment against you in a federal court. You are asking for relief from the conviction or the sentence. This form is your motion for relief. 2. You must file the form in the United States district court that entered the judgment that you are challenging. If you want to challenge a federal judgment that imposed a sentence to be served in the future, you should file the motion in the federal court that entered that judgment. 3. Make sure the form is typed or neatly written. 4. You must tell the truth and sign the form.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belle v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Belle v. United States (Belle v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related